An Alameda County judge blames Monsanto for cancer-causing agent despite cutting $2 billion award
Even as a judge sliced an award against Monsanto from $2 billion, she reaffirmed the jury's conclusion that the company's weedkiller was "a substantial factor" in causing cancer.
|Judge Winifred Smith|
But the judge also asserted, according to an Associated Press story, that evidence "supported the finding that Monsanto knew the herbicide's active ingredient, glyphosate, could be dangerous and failed to warn the couple from Livermore, California."
It marked the third time a judge had reduced an award over the disputed chemical.
Smith cut the punitive damages from $1 billion each to $70 million for the pair, and awarded the Pilliods $17 million for future pain and suffering.
The lawyer for the couple, Brent Wisner, called the overall ruling "a major victory."
But Monsanto's corporate parent, the German pharmaceutical firm Bayer AG, intends to appeal.
The three California trials were the first involving an estimated 13,000 plaintiffs with pending suits again the agribusiness, the AP story indicates.
Monsanto will face its first non-California trial at a courthouse in St. Louis this month.
Information about other trials of manufacturers whose products cause disease can be found in "Rollercoaster: How a man can survive his partner's breast cancer," a VitalityPress book that I,
Woody Weingarten, aimed at male caregivers.
Post a Comment